Lolita 
Skilled troubles are mounting for a London lawyer who tried to sue a choose after dropping a case marked by “incomprehensible authorized gibberish” and after being discovered by a court docket to have made racist and misogynist feedback to opponents and others.
Article content material
Skilled troubles are mounting for a London lawyer who tried to sue a choose after dropping a case marked by “incomprehensible authorized gibberish” and after being discovered by a court docket to have made racist and misogynist feedback to opponents and others.
Commercial 2
Article content material
The Legislation Society of Ontario’s tribunal suspended Oussama Hamza indefinitely Wednesday for allegedly refusing to adjust to society requests for paperwork associated to investigations of his actions.
He faces much more severe allegations about these actions, in accordance with a discover filed final month on the tribunal, together with making racist and sexist remarks on social media and court docket paperwork and “hostile, inflammatory, inaccurate and discriminatory written statements in court docket paperwork and in associated correspondence, and on his agency’s web site.”
In the meantime, Hamza’s latest defence of a girl who was discovered by a court docket to have used a faux title to attempt to sue the CBC is also inflicting consternation in authorized circles.
Commercial 3
Article content material
Hamza couldn’t be reached for remark Wednesday. Calls to his workplace cellphone prompted a voice message directing individuals to his web site, earlier than saying goodbye and hanging up.
The web site was not working Wednesday. On the house web page was a discover asking individuals to signal a “petition towards” to enter the web site. The discover didn’t say what the petition was opposing and the hyperlink to the remainder of the web site didn’t work.
Hamza started incomes public notoriety in fall 2020, when lawyer Vincent Rocheleau posted LinkedIn messages encouraging ladies to participate in a College of Ottawa mission about their experiences with the COVID-19 pandemic.
In response to court docket rulings, Hamza replied on LinkedIn with messages about ladies’s contributions to academia, together with that “ladies didn’t write their histories as a result of they didn’t care to take action” and “ladies simply don’t care about historical past or philosophy” as a result of “ladies don’t typically take into account being a thinker or historian ‘attractive.’ ”
Commercial 4
Article content material
Hamza defended himself with feedback about his critics, together with that Rocheleau and one other particular person “had been colonizing and genociding the nation,” and that white ladies had been “elevating murderers of Indians and blacks they now fake to help towards ‘villains’ like” him, in accordance with court docket paperwork.
Rocheleau filed a grievance with the Legislation Society of Ontario that Hamza’s feedback have been racist and sexist.
One other Hamza put up led to a different grievance to the legislation society. The put up confirmed a photograph of legislation pupil Ismail Aderonmu, his spouse and youngsters, with speech and thought bubbles making derogatory feedback about every, in accordance with a court docket choice.
Aderonmu’s grievance alleged posting such content material is “conduct unbecoming of a lawyer.”
Commercial 5
Article content material
The legislation society launched an investigation, however Hamza allegedly refused to co-operate, as an alternative going to court docket in search of at the least $215,000 in damages.
Hamza additionally sought a number of orders, together with that:
- He not be required to discuss with any choose sooner or later as Your Honour or Justice.
- He “shall not pay taxes to a European colonizer, however to a ‘purple Indian’ consultant in authorities.”
- He not pay charges to the legislation society, “which shall be declared racist.”
- Aderonmu not be admitted to the bar.
In April 2021, Superior Court docket Justice Thomas Heeney threw out the matter on a technicality, however made it clear your entire case was with out advantage.
The authorized discover and factum filed by Hamza “quantity to over 1,000 pages of rambling, pseudo-intellectual assaults on the (legislation society) and the opposite respondents, expressions of his opinion on their character and integrity, racist and misogynist assaults on the respondents and the judiciary, arguments that quantity to little greater than incomprehensible authorized gibberish,” Heeney wrote.
Commercial 6
Article content material
Hamza’s calls for about taxes and judges ”can pretty be described as nonsense,” Heeney added. “They’re untenable at legislation and haven’t any probability of success.”
Heeney later ordered Hamza to pay prices of $33,000 to the legislation society and $12,742.86 to Aderonmu.
Hamza then sued, in French, the identical individuals plus Heeney. Superior Court docket Justice Robin Tremblay threw out that motion as “frivolous, vexatious and an abuse of the court docket” in a call printed Jan. 17, 2022.
Hamza additionally took his case to the Ontario Court docket of Enchantment. It upheld Heeney’s choice, dismissed the attraction, and located Hamza’s authorized arguments “proceed to make racist and misogynistic statements and embody private assaults on the respondents, . . . the movement choose and the respondents’ authorized counsel. We’re happy that the attraction is frivolous, vexatious and an abuse of the method of the court docket.”
Commercial 7
Article content material
The legislation society started investigating Hamza sooner or later, and a tribunal listening to discover in March alleged Hamza has contravened Legislation Society Act skilled conduct guidelines since Dec. 1, 2021, by failing to co-operate in a probe of his actions by refusing to completely reply to legislation society emails and letters.
After a listening to Tuesday, the tribunal dominated Hamza’s licence can be suspended the subsequent day till he responded to the correspondence. After that, he would stay suspended for an additional month.
No listening to date has been set for the investigation of his actions. However the discover for the listening to outlines seven allegations about ongoing actions that started in 2020.
The allegations embody that Hamza:
- Made “discriminatory, racist, sexist or offensive feedback on social media, on his agency’s web site, in court docket paperwork and in associated correspondence, which have been directed at members of the general public, the legislation society, complainants to the legislation society, members of the judiciary, different licensees and the Canadian justice system.”
- Tried to impede a legislation society investigation by threatening to take authorized motion and “breached his responsibility to behave with integrity, particularly his responsibility to practise legislation and discharge all of his obligations to his purchasers, courts, the general public and different members of the occupation, by making hostile, inflammatory, inaccurate and discriminatory written statements in court docket paperwork and in associated correspondence, and on his agency’s web site.”
Commercial 8
Article content material
Regardless of the sooner troubles, Hamza continued to practise legislation till this week, and that introduced him to a weird case involving the CBC over a March 2021 investigative piece by reporter Jennifer Chevalier into suspicions a psychological well being charity was run by a girl with a secret identification.
An individual named Kamala Tiwari sued CBC for $20 million in damages. The broadcaster introduced a movement to dismiss the lawsuit, claiming Tiwari is a faux title and the precise plaintiff was Althea Reyes.
Reyes, who has been declared a vexatious litigant underneath Sec. 140 of Ontario’s Courts of Justice Act, can’t begin a authorized motion and not using a court docket’s permission. A vexatious litigant is somebody deemed to have introduced ahead a number of, frivolous claims to the courts.
Commercial 9
Article content material
At a March 17 Zoom listening to, in accordance with the court docket choice, Superior Court docket Justice Heather Williams requested Hamza if his consumer was on the display screen. Hamza didn’t reply, saying the choose ought to ask the opposite events in court docket as a result of they claimed to know who his consumer was. The choose then requested a girl on the display screen if she was the plaintiff. Hamza interrupted and once more informed the choose to ask the opposite events, though the girl then indicated she was Kamala Tiwari.
Williams dismissed the go well with in a call printed in Could, saying it was seemingly Reyes began the authorized motion underneath the title Tiwari.
“Lastly, I need to add that Mr. Hamza’s participation on this matter was of concern to me, given his standing as an officer of the court docket,” Williams added.
Commercial
